Free Daily Macro Calculator | Copilotly
Skip to main content
Life

Daily Macro Calculator

Body stats + activity + goal. Get daily calorie target and protein, carb, and fat grams.

🔒 Runs locallyInstant recalculation🆓 Free forever
Loading tool…
Get your daily calorie target and macronutrient breakdown (protein, carbs, fat) based on your body stats, activity level, and goal. The math uses the Mifflin-St Jeor equation - the most accurate BMR formula for the general population - plus activity multipliers and goal-adjusted protein targets that registered dietitians actually use.
01

How this calculator works

Three steps:

  1. BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate) via Mifflin-St Jeor:
    10 * weight(kg) + 6.25 * height(cm) - 5 * age + sex_adjustment
    Sex adjustment is +5 for males, -161 for females. This is your maintenance calories at total rest.
  2. TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) = BMR × activity multiplier (1.2 for sedentary up to 1.9 for athlete).
  3. Goal target = TDEE + goal delta (-500 for cut, 0 for maintain, +300 for bulk).

From the calorie target, protein is set first (based on bodyweight and goal), fat is set as a percentage of calories (28%), and carbs fill what is left.

02

Why Mifflin-St Jeor and not Harris-Benedict?

The Harris-Benedict equation (1919, revised 1984) was the standard for decades. The Mifflin-St Jeor equation (1990) was developed specifically because Harris-Benedict over-estimated BMR in modern populations by 5-10%, leading to over-prescribed calories and stalled fat loss.

Mifflin-St Jeor is now the recommended formula in the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics guidelines. For body-fat-normalized accuracy you would use Katch-McArdle (which requires knowing your body fat percentage). For everyone else, Mifflin-St Jeor is the most accurate readily-available formula.

03

Choosing the right activity multiplier

This is where most calculators get it wrong: people overestimate their activity level. Honest descriptions:

  • Sedentary (1.2): Desk job, no formal exercise, less than 5,000 steps/day. This is most knowledge workers who do not go to the gym.
  • Light (1.375): Desk job + 1-3 short workouts per week. Or active job + minimal training.
  • Moderate (1.55): 3-5 hard workouts per week + general daily activity. This is most regular gym-goers.
  • Active (1.725): 6-7 sessions per week, often including hard cardio. Or a physically demanding job + some training.
  • Athlete (1.9): 2+ sessions per day, or competitive endurance training, or genuinely heavy manual labor + training.

If your weight is not changing as the math predicts after 4-6 weeks, your real activity level is one notch lower than you picked. This is almost always the issue.

04

Why protein scales with bodyweight, not calories

Protein needs are driven by lean body mass and goal, not by total calories. The targets we use:

  • Cut (1.0 g/lb): Higher protein during a deficit preserves lean mass. Research supports 0.8-1.2 g/lb for active people losing fat.
  • Maintain (0.75 g/lb): The standard "active adult" recommendation.
  • Bulk (0.85 g/lb): Slightly higher than maintenance to support muscle protein synthesis during a surplus.

These are higher than the RDA (0.36 g/lb) because the RDA is set to prevent deficiency, not to optimize body composition. If you are sedentary or much older, you can go lower.

05

How fat and carbs get divided

After protein is set, fat is fixed at 28% of total calories. The remainder is carbs. Why 28%? It is the middle of the practitioner-recommended 25-35% range, leaves enough carbs for hard training, and is sustainable long-term.

If you prefer a higher-fat or lower-fat approach (keto, low-carb, plant-based), the calculator gives you the calorie and protein targets; you can shift fat and carbs around within the calorie budget. As long as you hit protein and calories, the fat/carb split is largely cosmetic for fat loss or maintenance.

For meal planning, recipes, and specific dietary preferences (vegan, gluten-free, etc.), the Nutrition Copilot builds plans around these targets.

06

When this calculator is wrong

This is a starting point, not a prescription. It will be off if:

  • Your body fat percentage is very low (under 10% male / 15% female) or very high (over 35%). Use Katch-McArdle instead.
  • You are pregnant or breastfeeding (different needs).
  • You have a metabolic condition (thyroid disorders, PCOS, diabetes affecting energy expenditure).
  • You are recovering from significant weight loss or have a history of chronic dieting (likely lower TDEE than predicted).

The real test: track for 2-3 weeks and adjust based on what your body actually does, not what the math predicts.

When to use this
  • Starting a cut, bulk, or recomp and need a calorie target
  • Anyone confused by competing calculator results - this uses the most-trusted formula
  • Building meal plans where protein and calorie targets matter
  • Validating what your trainer or nutritionist suggested
  • Adjusting macros after a plateau
𝑓How the math works
BMR via Mifflin-St Jeor (10 × kg weight + 6.25 × cm height - 5 × age + sex factor). TDEE = BMR × activity multiplier (1.2 to 1.9). Goal target = TDEE + delta (-500, 0, or +300). Protein scales with bodyweight in pounds (0.75-1.0 g/lb based on goal). Fat fixed at 28% of calories. Carbs fill remainder.
?

Frequently asked questions

Why do I lose weight slower than this predicts?
Two most common reasons: (1) you under-estimate the calories you actually eat, especially liquids, dressings, and condiments. (2) your activity multiplier is one notch too high. Track honestly for 2 weeks and adjust.
How do I know if I am eating enough protein?
If you are training hard and recovering well between sessions, you are probably hitting it. Underfueling on protein shows up as sluggish recovery, loss of strength on a cut, or stalled muscle gain on a bulk.
Is the 500-calorie deficit too aggressive?
Depends on starting weight. For most adults wanting to lose 1 lb/week, 500/day works fine. Lighter individuals (under 130 lb) often need a smaller deficit (250-350) to avoid losing lean mass.
Can I use this if I am vegan or vegetarian?
Yes - the calorie and macro targets are diet-agnostic. The Nutrition Copilot can build plant-based meal plans that hit these targets.
Why is fat fixed at 28% and not adjustable?
Simplicity. The 25-35% range is what most practitioners recommend; 28% sits in the middle. You can shift fat-vs-carb within the calorie budget if you have a strong preference - as long as protein hits.
The real value

A tool gives you a number.
A copilot gives you a plan.

Nutrition Copilot takes everything this tool surfaces and walks you through what to actually do with it. Free to start, no card needed.

Open Nutrition Copilot
Free, no credit card

Stop Googling. Start asking a real specialist.

One subscription unlocks 131 AI copilots across legal, tax, health, finance, career, and 16 more fields. The first question pays for the year.

Setup in 30 secondsAll 131 copilots on the free tierCancel anytime, no friction
4.9/5
10,000+ professionals trust Copilotly$29/mo Pro, free tier forever